Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc.

S.D. New York

Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc.

DecidedSeptember 28, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-03925

StatusUnknown

This text of Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc. (Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LESLIE GERALDES, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-03925 (AS)

SPANISH DANCE ARTS COMPANY, INC., OPINION & ORDER et al., Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: This is a lawsuit for unpaid wages under New York Labor Law. See Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 59–66; Dkt. 21 at 1. In addition, plaintiff alleges that defendant failed to provide proper wage notices and wage statements, in violation of the New York State Wage Theft Prevention Act (WTPA). See Dkt. 1 ¶ 69. In a joint status letter, defendant asserted that this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s wage notice and statement claims. Dkt. 21 at 2. The issue was further discussed at the initial pretrial conference. After, the parties submitted emails with further support for their respective positions. “Because the standing issue goes to this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, it can be raised sua sponte.” Cent. States Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C., 433 F.3d 181, 198 (2d Cir. 2005). For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s wage notice and statement claims are DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of Article III standing. In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that her weekly working hours were “not itemized on her bi-monthly wage statement” and that she “did not receive annual wage notices” required by law. Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 38, 42, 69–70. As explained in this Court’s opinion in Cartagena v. Sixth Avenue West Associates LLC, No. 23-cv-03611-AS (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2023), at Dkt. 20, such allegations are insufficient. Plaintiff must identify the “downstream consequences from failing to receive the required information” because “informational injury that causes no adverse effects cannot satisfy Article III.” TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190, 2214 (2021). Plaintiff may amend her complaint to cure the standing deficiencies identified in this order no later than October 12, 2023. If she chooses to do so, she should provide specific factual allegations regarding how defendant violated the WTPA and what harm resulted to her because of that statutory violation. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2023 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LESLIE GERALDES, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-03925 (AS)

SPANISH DANCE ARTS COMPANY, INC., OPINION & ORDER et al., Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: This is a lawsuit for unpaid wages under New York Labor Law. See Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 59–66; Dkt. 21 at 1. In addition, plaintiff alleges that defendant failed to provide proper wage notices and wage statements, in violation of the New York State Wage Theft Prevention Act (WTPA). See Dkt. 1 ¶ 69. In a joint status letter, defendant asserted that this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s wage notice and statement claims. Dkt. 21 at 2. The issue was further discussed at the initial pretrial conference. After, the parties submitted emails with further support for their respective positions. “Because the standing issue goes to this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, it can be raised sua sponte.” Cent. States Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C., 433 F.3d 181, 198 (2d Cir. 2005). For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s wage notice and statement claims are DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of Article III standing. In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that her weekly working hours were “not itemized on her bi-monthly wage statement” and that she “did not receive annual wage notices” required by law. Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 38, 42, 69–70. As explained in this Court’s opinion in Cartagena v. Sixth Avenue West Associates LLC, No. 23-cv-03611-AS (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2023), at Dkt. 20, such allegations are insufficient. Plaintiff must identify the “downstream consequences from failing to receive the required information” because “informational injury that causes no adverse effects cannot satisfy Article III.” TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190, 2214 (2021). Plaintiff may amend her complaint to cure the standing deficiencies identified in this order no later than October 12, 2023. If she chooses to do so, she should provide specific factual allegations regarding how defendant violated the WTPA and what harm resulted to her because of that statutory violation. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2023 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Geraldes v. Spanish Dance Arts Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geraldes-v-spanish-dance-arts-company-inc-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack