Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. and Lana Davis v. Earl Newsome and Gail Newsome, Individually and as Sole Heirs of Jill Newsome

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 23, 2010
Docket14-97-00526-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. and Lana Davis v. Earl Newsome and Gail Newsome, Individually and as Sole Heirs of Jill Newsome (Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. and Lana Davis v. Earl Newsome and Gail Newsome, Individually and as Sole Heirs of Jill Newsome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. and Lana Davis v. Earl Newsome and Gail Newsome, Individually and as Sole Heirs of Jill Newsome, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 23, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-97-00526-CV

GERALD W. JOHNSON, M.D. and LANA DAVIS, Appellants

V.

EARL NEWSOME and GAIL NEWSOME,

Individually and as sole heirs of JILL NEWSOME, Appellees


On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 79-42525-H


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 16, 1997.  On November 20, 1997, this court abated this appeal because appellant Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 97-51245-H1-11.  See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, the court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed on December 9, 1999.  The parties failed to advise this court of the bankruptcy court action.

            On November 18, 2010, this court issued an order stating that unless any party to the appeal filed a motion demonstrating good cause to retain the appeal within twenty days of the date of the order, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).  No response was filed. 

            Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal and order it dismissed.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerald W. Johnson, M.D. and Lana Davis v. Earl Newsome and Gail Newsome, Individually and as Sole Heirs of Jill Newsome, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-w-johnson-md-and-lana-davis-v-earl-newsome--texapp-2010.