Gerald v. State

925 So. 2d 347, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1409, 2006 WL 265099
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-6166
StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 347 (Gerald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald v. State, 925 So. 2d 347, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1409, 2006 WL 265099 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Chandler v. Dugger, 634 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1994)(holding that habeas corpus is not to be used for additional appeals of issues that could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal); Gray v. Wainwright, 442 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(holding that habe-as corpus is not a substitute for a direct appeal).

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. Dugger
634 So. 2d 1066 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Gray v. Wainwright
442 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 So. 2d 347, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1409, 2006 WL 265099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.