Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gerald v. State

Gerald v. State

925 So. 2d 347, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1409, 2006 WL 265099
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2006·No. No. 1D05-6166·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Chandler v. Dugger, 634 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1994)(holding that habeas corpus is not to be used for additional appeals of issues that could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal); Gray v. Wainwright, 442 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(holding that habe-as corpus is not a substitute for a direct appeal).

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald v. State, 925 So. 2d 347, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1409, 2006 WL 265099 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

925 So. 2d 347 (Gerald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chandler v. Dugger
634 So. 2d 1066 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Gray v. Wainwright
442 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)