Gerald v. City of Boston
This text of 108 Mass. 580 (Gerald v. City of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions whether the plaintiff was justified in going on the outside of the sidewalk upon the part of the street wrought and used especially for carriages, and whether in doing so under the circumstances he was in the exercise of due care and prudence, as well as whether the pile of snow upon which he slipped and fell was, in that place, a defect of which he had a right to complain, should have been submitted to the jury. Raymond v. Louiell, 6 Cush. 524. As the instructions were too restrictive in these respects, the verdict must be set aside.
Exceptions sustained.
Upon a new trial, the plaintiff obtained a verdict, on which judgment was rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 Mass. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-v-city-of-boston-mass-1871.