Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 2002
Docket10-02-00051-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State (Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State


IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-02-051-CR

No. 10-02-052-CR


     GERALD TYRONE TURNER,

                                                                         Appellant

     v.


     THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                         Appellee


From the 382nd District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2-00-339 and 2-00-340

DISSENTING OPINION

      This is the second motion to withdraw that has been filed by counsel. The first was denied by the Fifth Court of Appeals before this case was transferred to this court. The motion was denied because it was defective. This motion is also defective. Counsel does not assert that Turner has been notified of his right to object to the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 6.5.

      Further, the motion offers no reason that the motion should be granted. While it does assert that Turner is indigent, it does not assert that Counsel has not already been paid for the services or that there is some compelling reason that counsel should be released from his agreement to represent Turner.

      The motion also erroneously asserts that granting the motion will not work a delay. It already has caused a delay and ordering this cause abated will cause further delay. According to the motion, the trial court is waiting on our decision on the motion to withdraw before the trial court acts on the motion to appoint counsel. We are now waiting on the trial court before we decide the motion.

      I would deny the motion and order retained counsel to prepare and file appellant’s brief, thus compelling counsel to deal with the situation he has created. Because the majority does not, I respectfully dissent.

      The issue of a free record is not currently before us. I would not address it and do not join the majority’s discussion related thereto.


                                                                         TOM GRAY

                                                                         Justice


Dissenting opinion delivered and filed April 24, 2002

Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-tyrone-turner-v-state-texapp-2002.