Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party

Third Circuit

Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party

488 F.2d 1087, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6407

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1973

Docket73-2962

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 488 F.2d 1087 (Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party, 488 F.2d 1087, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6407 (3d Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ. Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ. Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 F.2d 1087, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-ray-v-texaco-inc-defendants-third-party-v-noble-drilling-ca3-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack