Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party

488 F.2d 1087, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6407
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 18, 1973·No. 73-2962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ. Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party, 488 F.2d 1087, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6407 (3d Cir. 1973).

488 F.2d 1087 (Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related