Gerald Ray Johnson v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Gerald Ray Johnson v. United States

339 F.2d 29, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1964

Docket21665_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 339 F.2d 29 (Gerald Ray Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerald Ray Johnson v. United States, 339 F.2d 29, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the denial of his motion made pursuant to Title 28 U. S.C.A. § 2255. In considering the motion, the court appointed competent counsel to represent the appellant and held’ *30 a pretrial conference. Thereafter, appointed counsel and the court made an investigation of the files and records. Counsel advised the court that it was his considered opinion, after thorough investigation, that an evidentiary hearing on the motion would serve no useful purpose. Based upon recommendations of counsel and its own examination of such files and records, the trial court concluded that there was no merit in the contentions of the appellant. We agree with the conclusions reached.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the denial of his motion made pursuant to Title 28 U. S.C.A. § 2255. In considering the motion, the court appointed competent counsel to represent the appellant and held’ *30 a pretrial conference. Thereafter, appointed counsel and the court made an investigation of the files and records. Counsel advised the court that it was his considered opinion, after thorough investigation, that an evidentiary hearing on the motion would serve no useful purpose. Based upon recommendations of counsel and its own examination of such files and records, the trial court concluded that there was no merit in the contentions of the appellant. We agree with the conclusions reached.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

339 F.2d 29, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-ray-johnson-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack