Gerald Napouk v. Lvmpd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2025
Docket23-15726
StatusPublished

This text of Gerald Napouk v. Lvmpd (Gerald Napouk v. Lvmpd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald Napouk v. Lvmpd, (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERALD ELMER NAPOUK, No. 23-15726 individually, and as Co-Special Administrator of the Estate of Lloyd D.C. No. Gerald Napouk; MARY NAPOUK, 2:20-cv-01859- individually, and as Co-Special JCM-BNW Administrator of the Estate of Lloyd Gerald Napouk; FREDRICK WAID, as Co-Special Administrator of the ORDER Estate of Lloyd Gerald Napouk,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; BUFORD KENTON; CAMERAN GUNN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Filed March 26, 2025

Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Lawrence VanDyke, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges. 2 NAPOUK V. LVMPD

ORDER Judge Nelson and Judge VanDyke voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Sanchez voted to grant the petition. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 40. Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc (Dkt. No. 46) is thus DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerald Napouk v. Lvmpd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-napouk-v-lvmpd-ca9-2025.