Gerald Martin Hansen v. United States

961 F.2d 1538, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12448, 1992 WL 102055
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gerald Martin Hansen v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 956 F.2d 245
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 8, 1992·No. 90-3796·Published

Opinion

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

This case has been returned to our court by the district court pursuant to that court’s order of March 31, 1992. 788 F.Supp. 550. We remanded the case to the district court for a determination of whether there was a court reporter’s original sound tape of the sentencing proceedings. Appellant specifically sought in his appeal such sound tapes. He did so for the purpose of attempting to establish that he was sentenced illegally in retaliation for his exercise of his right to trial by jury.

We attach a copy of the district court order to this opinion. To the district court’s order is attached affidavits of both the court reporter and the secretary to the court reporter, both of whom affirm that there was no tape recording of the sentencing hearing.

The appellant having dropped all of the issues on appeal except that of the claim of retaliation, and it appearing that there is no evidence to support appellant’s claim, the order of the district court denying Hansen’s motion to vacate his sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald Martin Hansen v. United States, 961 F.2d 1538, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12448, 1992 WL 102055 (11th Cir. 1992).

961 F.2d 1538 (Gerald Martin Hansen v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hansen
788 F. Supp. 550 (M.D. Florida, 1992)