Gerald M. Moore and Son, Incorporated v. Joseph S. Drewry, Jr., and Drewry and Associates, Incorporated

81 F.3d 514, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8724, 1996 WL 192878
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1996·No. 94-2024·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reversed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge.

Joseph S. Drewry, Jr. (Drewry) was president of Drewry and Associates, Inc. (D & A), which entered a contract with Gerald M. Moore & Son, Inc. One question presented was whether Drewry, as president of D & A and the engineer who performed the work called for, was liable for the purely economic losses resulting from the negligent performance of the contract.

The question was certified to the Supreme Court of Virginia which held that “in the absence of privity, a person cannot be held liable for economic loss damages caused by his negligent performance of a contract.” Hence “the certified question was answered in the negative.”

Accordingly, the opinion holding Drewry individually liable under the economic loss doctrine is

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald M. Moore and Son, Incorporated v. Joseph S. Drewry, Jr., and Drewry and Associates, Incorporated, 81 F.3d 514, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8724, 1996 WL 192878 (4th Cir. 1996).

81 F.3d 514 (Gerald M. Moore and Son, Incorporated v. Joseph S. Drewry, Jr., and Drewry and Associates, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerald M. Moore & Son, Inc. v. Drewry & Associates, Inc.
945 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Virginia, 1996)