Gerald Lee Ricks v. Suzanne S. Radcliffe

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 30, 2015
Docket14-15-00825-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gerald Lee Ricks v. Suzanne S. Radcliffe (Gerald Lee Ricks v. Suzanne S. Radcliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald Lee Ricks v. Suzanne S. Radcliffe, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Mf. J5 • tttes ^y FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS CAUSE NO. 15-CV-0096 SEP 3 0 2015 GERALD LEE RICKS, § IN THE IjlfiMRSSQPHgeofc'PRINE Plaintiff l CLERK § vs. 405TH DISTRICT COURT

SUZANNE S. RADCLIFFE Defendant § GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

DOCKETING STATEMENT

1. Plaintiff, Gerald Lee Ricks, files this docketing

statement pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 32.

2. Plaintiff, Gerald Lee Ricks' TDCJ Id. #1049115; 3001

South Emily Drive, Beeville, Texas 78102.

3. The Notice of Appeal was filed on September 23, 2015, in

the 405th District Court, Galveston County, Galveston, Texas

77551.

4. The trial court judge was the Honorable Michelle

Slaughter. The Court signed Defendant's Motion For Summary

Judgement on 6-15-2015. Thereafter, plaintiff filed his

first Motion For New Trial on 06-2-2015. The Court denied

said motion on 07-27-2015.

5. Defendant then filed its Motion For Sanctions on

07-09-2015. The Court granted the defendant's Motion For

Sanctions on 07-27-2015. Plaintiff then filed his second

Motion For New Trial on 08-26-2015. The Court denied said

motion on 09-04-2015.

6. The party involved in this action is Suzanne Schwab

Radcliffe. Suzanne Schwab Radcliffe was represented by Mr. Kenneth D. McConnico, 830 Apollo.Street, Houston, Texas

77058. 7. Plaintiff sued defendant for Intentional Infliction of

Emotional Distress, Conspiracy/Breach of Fiduciary Duty and

Conspiracy/Interference With Child Custody.

8. This appeal does not require any type of priority from

the Court of Appeals.

9. Plaintiff will not request the Reporter's Record and the

trial was not electronically recorded.

10. The Court Reported is Mary Piper.
11. Plaintiff does not intend to see any type of ancillary

relief while the appeal is pending.

12. There was no affidavit of indigence filed in this case.
13. No supersedes bond was filed.

Mr. Gera: Plaintiff Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Gerald Lee Ricks, certify and verify a true and

correct copy of the foregoing was served on counsel for

defendant at: Mr. Kenneth D. McConnico, Attorney-At-Law, 830

Apollo Street, Houston, Texas 77058, by delivering same, via

U.S. mail, postage prepaid. Executed on this the 27th day of September 2015.

Mr. Gerald Lee Plaintiff Pro Se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerald Lee Ricks v. Suzanne S. Radcliffe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-lee-ricks-v-suzanne-s-radcliffe-texapp-2015.