Gerald Hayes v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-09-00437-CR Style: Gerald Hayes v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: September 30, 2013 Type of motion: Motion filed Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant requests that we “abate all current proceedings, provide a full record to the appellant pro se — which has been denied by court and appellate counsel, permitting a timely supplement and arguments to the Anders briefing” and prays that we “review all issues enclosed and order approval to submit supplement by pro se appellant prior to any ruling.” Appellant filed his Anders response on July 8, 2013. Further, appellant’s motions regarding the appellate record have been previously addressed by this Court on June 10, 2013. The motion is DENIED.
Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: October 9, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerald Hayes v. State (Gerald Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.