Gerald Hayes v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 9, 2013·No. 01-09-00437-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-09-00437-CR Style: Gerald Hayes v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: September 30, 2013 Type of motion: Motion filed Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant requests that we “abate all current proceedings, provide a full record to the appellant pro se — which has been denied by court and appellate counsel, permitting a timely supplement and arguments to the Anders briefing” and prays that we “review all issues enclosed and order approval to submit supplement by pro se appellant prior to any ruling.” Appellant filed his Anders response on July 8, 2013. Further, appellant’s motions regarding the appellate record have been previously addressed by this Court on June 10, 2013. The motion is DENIED.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 9, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald Hayes v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Gerald Hayes v. State (Gerald Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.