GERALD ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 2017
Docket17-0627
StatusPublished

This text of GERALD ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA (GERALD ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GERALD ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GERALD ARMSTRONG, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-627

[July 27, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08000030CFAXMX.

Gerald Armstrong, Sneads, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GERALD ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-armstrong-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.