Geraghty v. Slutzkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geraghty v. Slutzkin

258 A.D. 869, 16 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7334

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs Cecelia Geraghty and Patricia Geraghty unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding of the jury that the accident was due to a defective electric light bulb was against the weight of the credible evidence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs Cecelia Geraghty and Patricia Geraghty unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding of the jury that the accident was due to a defective electric light bulb was against the weight of the credible evidence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Geraghty v. Slutzkin, 258 A.D. 869, 16 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 869 (Geraghty v. Slutzkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.