Geraghty v. Slutzkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geraghty v. Slutzkin

258 A.D. 869, 16 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7334

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 869 (Geraghty v. Slutzkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geraghty v. Slutzkin, 258 A.D. 869, 16 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs Cecelia Geraghty and Patricia Geraghty unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding of the jury that the accident was due to a defective electric light bulb was against the weight of the credible evidence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs Cecelia Geraghty and Patricia Geraghty unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding of the jury that the accident was due to a defective electric light bulb was against the weight of the credible evidence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 869, 16 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geraghty-v-slutzkin-nyappdiv-1939.