Geovanny Francisco Laguan v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 1, 2014
Docket01-12-00651-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Geovanny Francisco Laguan v. State (Geovanny Francisco Laguan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geovanny Francisco Laguan v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 1, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NOS. 01-12-00650-CR 01-12-00651-CR ——————————— GEOVANNY FRANCISCO LAGUAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case Nos. 11-CCR-158234 & 11-CCR-158058

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Geovanny Francisco Laguan, was convicted of operating a motor

vehicle without a driver’s license and cutting across a driveway at an intersection

to turn from one highway to another. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.41(3) (Vernon 2011) & TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 521.025 (Vernon 2013). Appellant

did not request or pay for a reporter’s record for over a year after these appeals

were filed. The record contains no suggestion that appellant is indigent, nor has

appellant made any request that a record be provided at no cost to him. After

appellant was given notice and an opportunity to cure, which he failed to do, this

Court ordered that the appeals be submitted for decision without a reporter’s

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c)(1). Appellant’s briefs were due August 19,

2013. However, appellant did not file briefs, and this Court ordered that the cases

be submitted without briefs if none were filed by October 17, 2013. Four months

have passed and no briefs have been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). Absent

briefs, no issues are presented for our review. Nevertheless, in the interest of

justice, we have reviewed the record for unassigned fundamental error. See Lott v.

State, 874 S.W. 2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (reviewing appeal for

unassigned fundamental error when appellant failed to file brief on appeal).

Finding no unassigned fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Sherry Radack Chief Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lott v. State
874 S.W.2d 687 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Geovanny Francisco Laguan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geovanny-francisco-laguan-v-state-texapp-2014.