Geotel, Inc. v. Wallace
76 N.Y.2d 917
This text of 76 N.Y.2d 917 (Geotel, Inc. v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Geotel, Inc. v. Wallace, 76 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1990).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal as against defendants Extebank and Laventhol and Horwath dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal as against The Stuart James Co. denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 N.Y.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geotel-inc-v-wallace-ny-1990.