Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp.
This text of Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp. (Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
GEOSPAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
2012-1032 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 08-CV-0816. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOSEPH P. TITTERINGTON, Dunlap Codding, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS J. SOROCCO and D. WARD HOBSON.
GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN, Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were DARREN B. SCHWIEBERT and KURT J. NIEDERLUECKE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 29, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geospan-corp-v-pictometry-international-corp-cafc-2012.