Georgian Co. v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgian Co. v. Jones

116 S.E. 65, 29 Ga. App. 410, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 39

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 7, 1923

Docket12694

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 65 (Georgian Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgian Co. v. Jones, 116 S.E. 65, 29 Ga. App. 410, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the evidence in the instant case, and the answer of the Supreme Court to the controlling question certified to it by this court (Georgia Co. v. Jones, 154 Ga. 762, 115 S. E. 490), the trial judge erred in directing the verdict for the plaintiff, which was limited to the amount of the first week’s default by the principal defendant in the payment to the plaintiff for newspapers delivered to the [411]*411principal under the contract signed by him and his sureties, and in not submitting the issues to the determination of the jury.

Decided February 7, 1923.

Action on contract; from city court of Brunswick—1 Judge Butts. June 12, 1922.

F. M. Scarlett Jr., for plaintiff. Krauss & Strong, for defendants.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., eoncur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the evidence in the instant case, and the answer of the Supreme Court to the controlling question certified to it by this court (Georgia Co. v. Jones, 154 Ga. 762, 115 S. E. 490), the trial judge erred in directing the verdict for the plaintiff, which was limited to the amount of the first week’s default by the principal defendant in the payment to the plaintiff for newspapers delivered to the [411]*411principal under the contract signed by him and his sureties, and in not submitting the issues to the determination of the jury.

Decided February 7, 1923.

Action on contract; from city court of Brunswick—1 Judge Butts. June 12, 1922.

F. M. Scarlett Jr., for plaintiff. Krauss & Strong, for defendants.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., eoncur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 65, 29 Ga. App. 410, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgian-co-v-jones-gactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack