Georgia v. South Carolina

Supreme Court

Georgia v. South Carolina

253 U.S. 477, 40 S. Ct. 585

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Georgia v. South Carolina. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 U.S. 516 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 7, 1920·No. No. 22·Published

Opinion

Motion for the appointment of a special master to také such testimony as may be necessary and to receive in evidence such exhibits as may be offered by the parties hereto, .granted, and, on the suggestion of counsel for. both parties,. Mr. Charles S. Douglás, of Washington D* C., appointed [478]*478as such special master and directed to report the testimony and exhibits to the court without conclusions of law or findings of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for the appointment of a special master to také such testimony as may be necessary and to receive in evidence such exhibits as may be offered by the parties hereto, .granted, and, on the suggestion of counsel for. both parties,. Mr. Charles S. Douglás, of Washington D* C., appointed [478]*478as such special master and directed to report the testimony and exhibits to the court without conclusions of law or findings of fact.

Georgia v. South Carolina, 253 U.S. 477, 40 S. Ct. 585 (1920).

Pincite

253 U.S. 477 (Georgia v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.