Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Zarks
This text of 34 S.E. 127 (Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Zarks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A request to charge, though based on a theory which might constitute a good defense to the action, was properly refused when it appeared not only that no such defense was set up, but that the defense actually relied upon was totally different.
2. Evidence is not merely cumulative, though it may have some bearing upon the main issue in controversy, if it relates to new, distinct, and material facts about which no witness testified at the trial. See Dale v. State, 88 Ga. 552. The newly discovered evidence in the present case, it being in any view a close and doubtful one, was not, under the rule just stated, merely cumulative,' and it was of sufficient importance to render the granting of a new trial proper and right.
3. The charges complained of in the motion for a new trial were not, in view of all the instructions given to the jury, erroneous or misleading.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 127, 108 Ga. 800, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-southern-florida-railway-co-v-zarks-ga-1899.