Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Tifton Produce Co.
This text of 139 S.E. 126 (Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Tifton Produce Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds. The evidence supports the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the case, and this court can not interfere.
2. The motion of the defendant in error asking for damages, on the [148]*148ground that the' ease was brought to the Court of Appeals for the purpose of delay only, is denied.
Judgment affin-med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 126, 37 Ga. App. 147, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-southern-florida-railway-co-v-tifton-produce-co-gactapp-1927.