Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Georgia Refining Co. v. Atlanta Milling Co.

Georgia Refining Co. v. Atlanta Milling Co.

83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 460, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 295
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 22, 1914
Docket5708
StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E. 795 (Georgia Refining Co. v. Atlanta Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Refining Co. v. Atlanta Milling Co., 83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 460, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. There was ample evidence upon which to base the finding of the court, and the errors complained of are not of sufficient materiality to require a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

2. The action being for damages for breach of contract, the finding of $8.65 as interest eo nomine, in addition to the principal sum sued for, was erroneous; and direction is given that this sum be written off the judgment. Snowden v. Waterman, 110 Ga. 100 (35 S. E. 309) ; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Brown, 102 Ga. 13 (29 S. E. 130).

. Judgment affirmed, with direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Brown
29 S.E. 130 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Snowden v. Waterman & Co.
35 S.E. 309 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 460, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-refining-co-v-atlanta-milling-co-gactapp-1914.