Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party

293 F.3d 760, 2002 WL 1225115
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 6, 2002·No. 99-60349·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case we certified a question to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, asking:

Whether an insurer’s duty to defend under a general commercial liability policy for injuries caused by accidents extends, under Mississippi law, to injuries unintended by the insured but which resulted from intentional actions of the insured if those actions were negligent but not intentionally tortious. 1

The details of the case are set out both in our certification 2 and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s answer. 3 Since it is now clear that, under Mississippi law, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. had no duty to defend Omnibank from the underlying suit, 4 we must REVERSE and REMAND for entry of summary judgment in favor of USF&G.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

1

. Ramsay v. OmniBank, 215 F.3d 502, 504 (5th Cir.2000).

2

. Id. at 502-03.

3

. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Omnibank, 812 So.2d 196, 197-98 (Miss.2002).

4

. Id. at 202.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party, 293 F.3d 760, 2002 WL 1225115 (3d Cir. 2002).

293 F.3d 760 (Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related