Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party

Third Circuit

Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party

293 F.3d 760, 2002 WL 1225115

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2002

Docket99-60349

StatusPublished

This text of 293 F.3d 760 (Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia Ramsay v. Omnibank, Omnibank, Defendant-Third Party v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party, 293 F.3d 760, 2002 WL 1225115 (3d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case we certified a question to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, asking:

Whether an insurer’s duty to defend under a general commercial liability policy for injuries caused by accidents extends, under Mississippi law, to injuries unintended by the insured but which resulted from intentional actions of the insured if those actions were negligent but not intentionally tortious. 1

The details of the case are set out both in our certification 2 and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s answer. 3 Since it is now clear that, under Mississippi law, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. had no duty to defend Omnibank from the underlying suit, 4 we must REVERSE and REMAND for entry of summary judgment in favor of USF&G.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

1

. Ramsay v. OmniBank, 215 F.3d 502, 504 (5th Cir.2000).

2

. Id. at 502-03.

3

. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Omnibank, 812 So.2d 196, 197-98 (Miss.2002).

4

. Id. at 202.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI