Georgia Railroad v. LaPrade
This text of 111 S.E. 694 (Georgia Railroad v. LaPrade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was conflict in the evidence as to whether the railroad company exercised that degree of care and diligence that would overcome the presumption raised by the statute upon proof that the mule in question was killed by the running of the railroad company’s train’s; and, there being some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict [457]*457being approved by the trial judge, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 S.E. 694, 28 Ga. App. 456, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-v-laprade-gactapp-1922.