Georgia Railroad v. Cole
This text of 4 S.E. 5 (Georgia Railroad v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a motion for new trial upon the ground alone that tiie verdict was without evidence to support it. This is (he third time this case has been here. It was here last at the March term, 1886, of this court (77 Ga. 77); and we then held that there was sufficient evidence to authorize (he jury to find for either party in the case, the evidence being conflicting. On the last trial of the case, there was but one witness examined who was not examined before— a man named Lanford; and his testimony was merely cumulative of what was proved on the former trial. We think now, as we did before, that there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.E. 5, 79 Ga. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-v-cole-ga-1887.