Georgia Railroad v. Bird
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 38 (Georgia Railroad v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where it was proved that a cow was killed by a railroad train, this imposed on the company the burden of showing that it was in the exercise of all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence, or that the damage was caused solely by the negligence of the owner of the cow, or, to diminish damages, that both were at fault. Negligence is a question for the jury, and the issues thus presented necessarily depend upon facts. Therefore, where the plaintiff obtained a verdict on the appeal trial in a justice’s court, and the defendant carried the case to the superior court by certiorari, if the judge sustained the certiorari, it was [39]*39proper to order a new trial and not to finally dispose of the case. Code, ¡4067 and cit.; 65 Ga„ 754; 68 Id., 650; 69 Id., 841.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-v-bird-ga-1885.