Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Walker

13 S.E. 511, 87 Ga. 204, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 128
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 8, 1891·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Simmons, J.

1. The fact that the people of a certain section had held a mass-meeting and agreed to disregard the “stock law” does not repeal the law, and evidence of such fact should not have been admitted.

2. In an action against a railroad company for the negligent killing [205]*205of a cow, evidence that the company had at different times paid other persons for cattle killed by its trains at the same place was irrelevant and inadmissible.

May 8, 1891. From McDuffie superior court, March term, 1890. Before Judge Roney. J. B. Cumming and Bryan Cumming, for plaintiff in error. S. A. Walker, -by brief, contra.

3. When the evidence shows conclusively that the servants of a railroad company used all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence to prevent the killing of a certain cow, a verdict in favor of the owner for the value of the animal is contrary to law and the evidence, and should be set aside. . Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Walker, 13 S.E. 511, 87 Ga. 204, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 128 (Ga. 1891).

13 S.E. 511 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Dilbeck
176 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Chapman v. Walden
188 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Interstate Forwarding Co. v. Vineyard
3 S.W.2d 947 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Lansdell
79 S.E. 1131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)