Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine

Supreme Court

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine

339 U.S. 901, 70 S. Ct. 472, 94 L. Ed. 1331, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2300

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 U.S. 299 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 1950·No. No. 454·Published

Opinion

[901]*901Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Per Curiam:

Inasmuch as the Attorney General of Georgia stated at the bar of this Court that plain, speedy, and efficient state remedies were available to appellant, the cause is ordered continued for such period as will enable appellant with all convenient speed to assert such remedies.

Victor Davidson and Standish Thompson filed a brief for certain counties and municipalities of Georgia, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[901]*901Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Per Curiam:

Inasmuch as the Attorney General of Georgia stated at the bar of this Court that plain, speedy, and efficient state remedies were available to appellant, the cause is ordered continued for such period as will enable appellant with all convenient speed to assert such remedies.

Victor Davidson and Standish Thompson filed a brief for certain counties and municipalities of Georgia, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, 339 U.S. 901, 70 S. Ct. 472, 94 L. Ed. 1331, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2300 (1950).

Pincite

339 U.S. 901 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.