Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine

339 U.S. 901, 70 S. Ct. 472, 94 L. Ed. 1331, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2300
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 1950
DocketNo. 454
StatusPublished

This text of 339 U.S. 901 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, 339 U.S. 901, 70 S. Ct. 472, 94 L. Ed. 1331, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2300 (1950).

Opinion

[901]*901Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Per Curiam:

Inasmuch as the Attorney General of Georgia stated at the bar of this Court that plain, speedy, and efficient state remedies were available to appellant, the cause is ordered continued for such period as will enable appellant with all convenient speed to assert such remedies.

Victor Davidson and Standish Thompson filed a brief for certain counties and municipalities of Georgia, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 U.S. 901, 70 S. Ct. 472, 94 L. Ed. 1331, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-redwine-scotus-1950.