Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Moon

10 S.E. 111, 80 Ga. 365
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1887·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

1. Where, upon a bill in equity for the recovery of land and an accounting for rents, issues and profits thereof to be made by an executrix of an estate and the heirs of the decedent, a verdict was found in favor of the complainant, but requiring it to pay to the estate a certain sum of money, whereupon the complainant moved for a new trial, which was refused and it excepted, but the bill of exceptions was not served upon one of the substantial defendants, this was a fatal defect, and the writ of error must be dismissed.

2. Such a defect could not be cured by an amendment making such defendant in the court below a party plaintiff in error on motion, especially where her counsel objected in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Moon, 10 S.E. 111, 80 Ga. 365 (Ga. 1887).

10 S.E. 111 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garrett v. NationsBank, NA (South)
491 S.E.2d 158 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Collins v. Alewine
115 S.E.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Irwin v. LeCraw
58 S.E.2d 383 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
43 S.E.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Countryman v. Coogler
157 F.2d 503 (Fifth Circuit, 1946)
Goswick v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
187 S.E. 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Merchants Transportation Co. v. Daniel
149 So. 401 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Southern Railway Co. v. Brock
64 S.E. 1083 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)