Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt
This text of 38 S.E. 40 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The assignment of error as to admitting evidence does not disclose what objection wásmade thereto when offered, and consequently is without merit here.
2. This was an action against a railroad company for personal injuries, in which the plaintiff established his own freedom from fault; and, under his pleadings and the evidence, it was a question for the jury whether he was injured in one of the ordinary risks of his employment or because of the negligence of fel[818]*818low-servants, for which the company is, under our statutes, liable. Accordingly this court will not set aside, after its approval by the trial judge, a verdict returned in the plaintiff’s favor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 40, 112 Ga. 817, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-hurt-ga-1901.