Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt

38 S.E. 40, 112 Ga. 817, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 97
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 28, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 S.E. 40 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt, 38 S.E. 40, 112 Ga. 817, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 97 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. The assignment of error as to admitting evidence does not disclose what objection wásmade thereto when offered, and consequently is without merit here.

2. This was an action against a railroad company for personal injuries, in which the plaintiff established his own freedom from fault; and, under his pleadings and the evidence, it was a question for the jury whether he was injured in one of the ordinary risks of his employment or because of the negligence of fel[818]*818low-servants, for which the company is, under our statutes, liable. Accordingly this court will not set aside, after its approval by the trial judge, a verdict returned in the plaintiff’s favor.

Argued January 29, Decided February 28, 1901. Action for damages. Before Judge Brinson. McDuffie superior court. January 19, 1900. Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, for plaintiff in error. Thomas E. Watson and Samuel E. Sibley, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Simmons, G. J., and Gobi, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foddrill v. Dooley
63 S.E. 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.E. 40, 112 Ga. 817, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-hurt-ga-1901.