Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Gardner
This text of 39 S.E. 299 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The verdict was sustained by the testimony. The defendant in error, having gone into possession of the land in dispute under a deed, enclosed it by a fence, and held the undisturbed possession of it for more than twenty years, had a complete prescriptive title and, therefore, the right to resist the trespass of the employees of the railroad company upon the land thus held and occupied.
2. A defendant may amend an answer by withdrawing an admission therein [898]*898made, and after so doing may introduce testimony tending to support the alle.gations of such answer as it stands after the amendment has been allowed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 299, 113 Ga. 897, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-gardner-ga-1901.