Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Gardner
Opinion
1. The verdict was sustained by the testimony. The defendant in error, having gone into possession of the land in dispute under a deed, enclosed it by a fence, and held the undisturbed possession of it for more than twenty years, had a complete prescriptive title and, therefore, the right to resist the trespass of the employees of the railroad company upon the land thus held and occupied.
2. A defendant may amend an answer by withdrawing an admission therein [898]*898made, and after so doing may introduce testimony tending to support the alle.gations of such answer as it stands after the amendment has been allowed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
39 S.E. 299 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.