Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Galloway
This text of 190 S.E. 431 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Galloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a damage suit for personal injuries, questions as to diligence and negligence, including contributory negligence, and the failure of the plaintiff to use ordinary care for his own safety, and what negligence constitutes the proximate cause of the injuries sued for, “are questions peculiarly for the jury, such as this court will decline to solve on demurrer except where such questions appear palpably clear, plain, and indisputable.” Southern Ry. Co. v. Slaton, 41 Ga. App. 759(3) (154 S. E. 718), and cit.
2. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to thr original petition, or in overruling the demurrer to the petition as? amended.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.E. 431, 55 Ga. App. 541, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-galloway-gactapp-1937.