Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Galloway

190 S.E. 431, 55 Ga. App. 541, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 417
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 18, 1937·No. 25940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In a damage suit for personal injuries, questions as to diligence and negligence, including contributory negligence, and the failure of the plaintiff to use ordinary care for his own safety, and what negligence constitutes the proximate cause of the injuries sued for, “are questions peculiarly for the jury, such as this court will decline to solve on demurrer except where such questions appear palpably clear, plain, and indisputable.” Southern Ry. Co. v. Slaton, 41 Ga. App. 759(3) (154 S. E. 718), and cit.

2. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to thr original petition, or in overruling the demurrer to the petition as? amended.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Galloway, 190 S.E. 431, 55 Ga. App. 541, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 417 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

190 S.E. 431 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Galloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Power Co. v. Edwards
220 S.E.2d 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)