Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. City of Atlanta

61 S.E. 1035, 131 Ga. 94, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 27
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 21, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Without regard to the question of the admissibility of evidence raised in the bill of exceptions, there was no abuse of discretion, under the evidence admitted without objection, in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendant municipal corporation from preventing the obstruction of the alleged public crossing of a street over the railroad tracks of the plaintiff, prior to final trial and full adjudication upon the merits of the case made by the equitable petition, under the law and facts.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Holden, J., disqualified. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. November 14, 1907. Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming and Sanders McDaniel, for plaintiff. James L. Mayson and William P. Hill, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. City of Atlanta, 61 S.E. 1035, 131 Ga. 94, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 27 (Ga. 1908).

61 S.E. 1035 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffith v. City of Hapeville
185 S.E. 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Overby
70 S.E. 664 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)