Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Benton
This text of 45 S.E. 70 (Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Benton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence did not warrant a finding against the defendant for punitive damages; and therefore a charge which in effect instructed the jury that they were authorized to find such damages was erroneous.
2. This not being a case where the entire injury sued for was to the peace and happiness of the plaintiff, it was erroneous to instruct the jury that they might take into consideration the worldly circumstances of the parties a.nd the amount of had faith in the transaction. Central R. Co. v. Almand, 116 Ga. 780. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.E. 70, 117 Ga. 785, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-banking-co-v-benton-ga-1903.