Georgia-Quebec Associates, Ltd. v. Cable Atlanta, Inc.

323 S.E.2d 230, 172 Ga. App. 311, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2492
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 4, 1984
Docket68623
StatusPublished

This text of 323 S.E.2d 230 (Georgia-Quebec Associates, Ltd. v. Cable Atlanta, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia-Quebec Associates, Ltd. v. Cable Atlanta, Inc., 323 S.E.2d 230, 172 Ga. App. 311, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2492 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Cable Atlanta, Inc. failed to answer garnishment proceedings and Georgia-Quebec Associates, Ltd. obtained a default judgment against it. Cable Atlanta filed a motion for relief from default, paid costs, and filed an affidavit stating it was not indebted to the defendant. After a hearing, the trial court granted Cable Atlanta’s motion for relief and [312]*312modified the judgment against it. Georgia-Quebec appeals contending the trial court misconstrued the applicable code section, OCGA § 18-4-91, and imposed on it the burden of proving that Cable Atlanta had actual knowledge rather than actual notice of the entry of default judgment. Georgia-Quebec further contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that the motion was timely filed.

Decided October 4, 1984. Michael Weinstock, for appellants. Viola L. Sellers, Flora V. Devine, David R. Osborne, for appellee.

We find no merit in appellant’s arguments. The trial court stated in its order: “The Court determines there is not sufficient evidence to support any actual notice prior to August 11, 1983.” Although the trial court also determined that appellee had no actual knowledge of the default judgment until 60 days before the date appellee filed its motion for relief, the trial court’s holding was that appellee did not receive actual notice of the entry of default judgment until that date. Therefore, the trial court properly granted relief under OCGA § 18-4-91. There being some evidence to support the finding of the trial court as trier of fact, we must therefore affirm. Porter v. Calhoun County, 162 Ga. App. 839 (293 SE2d 4) (1982).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Deen, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. Calhoun County
293 S.E.2d 4 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 S.E.2d 230, 172 Ga. App. 311, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-quebec-associates-ltd-v-cable-atlanta-inc-gactapp-1984.