Georgia Public-Service Commission v. Parcel Delivery Co.

170 S.E. 800, 177 Ga. 600, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 367
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 13, 1933
DocketNo. 9259
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 170 S.E. 800 (Georgia Public-Service Commission v. Parcel Delivery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Public-Service Commission v. Parcel Delivery Co., 170 S.E. 800, 177 Ga. 600, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 367 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Parcel Delivery Company brought a petition in which it attacked the constitutionality of the motor-carrier act of 1931 (Georgia L. Ex. Sess. 1931, pp. 99-114), and prayed that the Georgia Public-Service Commission and the members thereof be enjoined from enforcing the provisions of the act and from enforcing the rules and regulations of the commission made in accordance with the act against the Parcel Delivery Company, and from requiring that company to submit to the jurisdiction of the commission; and to enjoin the commission from instituting criminal prosecution against the drivers of the trucks operated by the company; and that the commission and the members thereof be enjoined from interfering with the business of the company; and that they be enjoined from collecting any fees for the issuance of certificates and licenses for its trucks, etc. The petition alleges that the defendants have threatened to institute criminal proceedings against the drivers of petitioner’s trucks, and have threatened to have the drivers arrested and prosecuted under the provisions of the act referred to. Upon the trial of the case the president of the Parcel Delivery Company testified that an agent of the Piiblic-Service Commission, acting on behalf of the commission, did threaten to arrest and institute criminal proceedings against the drivers of the trucks of the company, unless the company complied with the provisions of the act referred to, and that this agent threatened prosecution of the drivers of the company’s trucks unless the company complied with the rules and regulations of the Public-Service Commission. Tlie judge hearing the case granted an interlocutory injunction, and the defendants excepted.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, this case falls within the ruling in Cathcart Van & Storage Co. v. Atlanta, 169 Ga. 791 (151 S. E. 489); and it follows from the principles laid down that the court erred in granting the injunction. See also Southern Oil Stores Inc. v. Atlanta, post, 602.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. City of Tifton
50 S.E.2d 595 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
City of Nashville v. Snow
49 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
Cox v. Linder
14 S.E.2d 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Aiken v. Armistead
198 S.E. 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
McCullough Bros. v. City of Griffin
184 S.E. 599 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Corley v. City of Atlanta
182 S.E. 177 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
City of Albany v. National Linen Service Corp.
174 S.E. 621 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Howard v. Briarcliff Zoological Corp.
173 S.E. 391 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
National Linen Service Corp. v. Mayor of Milledgeville
171 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 800, 177 Ga. 600, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-public-service-commission-v-parcel-delivery-co-ga-1933.