GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL v. Buchanan

679 S.E.2d 712, 285 Ga. 553, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2037, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 306
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 2009
DocketS09A0440
StatusPublished

This text of 679 S.E.2d 712 (GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL v. Buchanan, 679 S.E.2d 712, 285 Ga. 553, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2037, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 306 (Ga. 2009).

Opinion

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellant, the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, appeals from the trial court’s order prohibiting the Attorney General for the State of Georgia from representing the Council in an attorney fee dispute with appellee Cody Buchanan’s counsel. Although Buchanan was indicted for numerous charges, including murder, he pled guilty on August 26, 2008, to the misdemeanor of the possession of a pistol by a person under the age of eighteen 1 and received First Offender treatment. Because Buchanan’s criminal case is completed *554 and because the Attorney General’s representation of the Council does not involve the merits of Buchanan’s criminal case but only whether the Council should pay attorney fees for the efforts of Buchanan’s counsel to be reinstated as counsel after substitute counsel was appointed for Buchanan by the Standards Council, we conclude there is no conflict in the present case that merits the Attorney General’s disqualification. 2

Decided June 15, 2009. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Meron Dagnew, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Peter J. Skandalakis, District Attorney, Gary W. Washington, Tisinger, Tisinger, Vance & Greer, Thomas E. Greer, for appellees. Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Emmet J. Bondurant, Michael A. Caplan, Christopher J. McFadden, Koehler & Riddick, Christine A. Koehler, Laura D. Hogue, amici curiae.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.
1

OCGA § 16-11-132.

2

Buchanan sought disqualification on several grounds, including on the ground that the Attorney General, through its advice to the Standards Council on the policies and controls of a defendant’s expenses, might acquire confidential information regarding a defendant’s case that could be used to the benefit of the State on appeal when the State might be represented by the Attorney General.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. Greenwood Homes, Inc.
679 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 S.E.2d 712, 285 Ga. 553, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2037, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-public-defender-standards-council-v-buchanan-ga-2009.