Georgia Pacific R. R. v. Walker

61 Miss. 481
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

" The rights of the railroad company were not affected by' the decree of foreclosure, because, being a purchaser of the equity of redemption in a part of the mortgaged land before the bill was filed, it was. not made a party defendant. But the sale under the foreclosure proceedings was not a nullity. The purchaser acquired all the rights of the mortgagee in the land, and this included the legal title to the land. He could either have sued in ejectment on this legal title, or have proceeded anew to foreclose the mortgage. The bill in this case is founded upon the theory that by his purchase the complainant became absolute owner of the property, that the equity of redemption of the company had been cut off by the sale. In this the complainant is mistaken. But the bill also contains a prayer for general relief, and on the facts stated he is entitled to foreclose the mortgage anew. The defendant- may now, as it might have done if it had been a party to the original proceeding, require the land owned by complainant to be first sold for the satisfaction of the mortgage debt, its land being subject only for any deficiency which may exist after such sale. Jones on Mortgages, § 1395,and authorities there cited; Frisehe v. Kramer, 16 Ohio 125.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Pacific R. R. v. Walker, 61 Miss. 481 (Mich. 1884).

61 Miss. 481 (Georgia Pacific R. R. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crystal River Lumber Co. v. Knight Turpentine Co.
67 So. 974 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1915)
Hope v. Shevill
137 A.D. 86 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Horr v. Herrington
1908 OK 226 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Greene v. Mussey
78 N.Y.S. 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)