Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation
This text of 204 F.3d 1359 (Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellants, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross-appellant, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED to make the attached alteration to the opinion, and it is further
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.
The mandate of the court will issue on March 1, 2000.
ATTACHMENT
United States Gypsum Company’s petition for rehearing is granted only to make the following deletion from the opinion issued on November 1, 1999 [195 F.3d 1322]:
Page 14, lines 21-23 [195 F.3d at 1330]: Delete the sentence “Moreover, the boards claimed by Georgia Pacific in its ElSystem were not ‘old boards,’ but instead were themselves patented products.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.3d 1359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-pacific-corporation-plaintiff-cross-v-united-states-gypsum-cafc-2000.