Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation

204 F.3d 1359
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2000
Docket97-1238, 97-1244
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 204 F.3d 1359 (Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation, 204 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellants, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross-appellant, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED to make the attached alteration to the opinion, and it is further

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

The mandate of the court will issue on March 1, 2000.

ATTACHMENT

United States Gypsum Company’s petition for rehearing is granted only to make the following deletion from the opinion issued on November 1, 1999 [195 F.3d 1322]:

Page 14, lines 21-23 [195 F.3d at 1330]: Delete the sentence “Moreover, the boards claimed by Georgia Pacific in its ElSystem were not ‘old boards,’ but instead were themselves patented products.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inre: Hitachi Metals, Ltd.
603 F. App'x 976 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
225 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (N.D. Iowa, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 F.3d 1359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-pacific-corporation-plaintiff-cross-v-united-states-gypsum-cafc-2000.