Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Trammell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Trammell

318 S.E.2d 761, 171 Ga. App. 18, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2083

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1984

Docket67643

StatusPublished

This text of 318 S.E.2d 761 (Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Trammell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Trammell, 318 S.E.2d 761, 171 Ga. App. 18, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2083 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Appellees Mary F. Trammell and her husband Donald brought this action against appellants Georgia-Pacific Corporation and its employee Esley Dubose, Jr., alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Following pretrial discovery, appellees moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Appellants bring this appeal from the trial court’s grant of that motion.

“ ‘Issues of negligence, including the related issues of assumption of risk, lack of ordinary care for one’s own safety, lack of ordinary care in avoiding the consequences of another’s negligence and comparative negligence, are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication whether for or against the plaintiff or the defendant, but must be resolved by a trial in the ordinary manner.’ [Cit.]” Malin v. Jaggers, 134 Ga. App. 806 (216 SE2d 666) (1975). The undisputed facts [19]*19of record show that Mrs. Trammell was injured when a fork lift, which was left unattended and idling by Dubose, rolled into her, pressing her against the side of her pickup truck. This incident occurred at Georgia-Pacific’s place of business while Mrs. Trammell was a business invitee. Appellants deny any negligence on their parts and aver that such an incident has never before occurred at a Georgia-Pacific facility. The facts of record, even though essentially without dispute as to the circumstances which resulted in Mrs. Trammell’s injuries, do not in this case establish negligence on appellants’ parts as a matter of law. See, e.g., Cowart v. Five Star Mobile Homes, 161 Ga. App. 278 (291 SE2d 13) (1982); Lozynsky v. Hutchinson, 159 Ga. App. 715 (285 SE2d 70) (1981); Charter Builders v. Sims Crane Service, 150 Ga. App. 100 (1) (256 SE2d 678) (1979). See also Black v. Miller, 114 Ga. App. 208 (2) (150 SE2d 466) (1966); United States v. Adams, 212 F2d 912 (5th Cir. 1954). Thus, the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

Decided May 16, 1984. Bernard R. Thomas, Sr., for appellants. Clifford H. Hardwick, for appellees.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope, Judge.

Appellees Mary F. Trammell and her husband Donald brought this action against appellants Georgia-Pacific Corporation and its employee Esley Dubose, Jr., alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Following pretrial discovery, appellees moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Appellants bring this appeal from the trial court’s grant of that motion.

“ ‘Issues of negligence, including the related issues of assumption of risk, lack of ordinary care for one’s own safety, lack of ordinary care in avoiding the consequences of another’s negligence and comparative negligence, are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication whether for or against the plaintiff or the defendant, but must be resolved by a trial in the ordinary manner.’ [Cit.]” Malin v. Jaggers, 134 Ga. App. 806 (216 SE2d 666) (1975). The undisputed facts [19]*19of record show that Mrs. Trammell was injured when a fork lift, which was left unattended and idling by Dubose, rolled into her, pressing her against the side of her pickup truck. This incident occurred at Georgia-Pacific’s place of business while Mrs. Trammell was a business invitee. Appellants deny any negligence on their parts and aver that such an incident has never before occurred at a Georgia-Pacific facility. The facts of record, even though essentially without dispute as to the circumstances which resulted in Mrs. Trammell’s injuries, do not in this case establish negligence on appellants’ parts as a matter of law. See, e.g., Cowart v. Five Star Mobile Homes, 161 Ga. App. 278 (291 SE2d 13) (1982); Lozynsky v. Hutchinson, 159 Ga. App. 715 (285 SE2d 70) (1981); Charter Builders v. Sims Crane Service, 150 Ga. App. 100 (1) (256 SE2d 678) (1979). See also Black v. Miller, 114 Ga. App. 208 (2) (150 SE2d 466) (1966); United States v. Adams, 212 F2d 912 (5th Cir. 1954). Thus, the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

Decided May 16, 1984. Bernard R. Thomas, Sr., for appellants. Clifford H. Hardwick, for appellees.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

318 S.E.2d 761, 171 Ga. App. 18, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-pacific-corp-v-trammell-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack