Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gatens
765 P.2d 250, 94 Or. App. 451, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2200
This text of 765 P.2d 250 (Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gatens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gatens, 765 P.2d 250, 94 Or. App. 451, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2200 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
The parties submitted their briefs in this judicial review on the assumption that our review is de novo. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law. ORS 656.298(6); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s order.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.
752 P.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
765 P.2d 250, 94 Or. App. 451, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-pacific-corp-v-gatens-orctapp-1988.