Georgia Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Georgia Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Hollingsworth

250 S.E.2d 433, 242 Ga. 522, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1272

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1978

Docket33848

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 250 S.E.2d 433 (Georgia Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Hollingsworth, 250 S.E.2d 433, 242 Ga. 522, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1272 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case because of an apparent conflict with another decision of the Court of Appeals in Hodges v. Doctors Hospital, 141 Ga. App. 649 (234 SE2d 116) (1977). The question for decision in both cases is whether a hospital is liable to a patient for negligent performance of professional services by a physician on its staff. The rule is that for the hospital to be held liable it must be shown that the doctor was an employee of the hospital and not an independent contractor. In this case, the Court of Appeals held that there was a material issue of fact on that question, and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the hospital was reversed. For the purposes of certiorari, we therefore find no conflict between this case and Hodges v. Doctors Hospital, supra. Accordingly, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan andBowles, JJ., who concur in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case because of an apparent conflict with another decision of the Court of Appeals in Hodges v. Doctors Hospital, 141 Ga. App. 649 (234 SE2d 116) (1977). The question for decision in both cases is whether a hospital is liable to a patient for negligent performance of professional services by a physician on its staff. The rule is that for the hospital to be held liable it must be shown that the doctor was an employee of the hospital and not an independent contractor. In this case, the Court of Appeals held that there was a material issue of fact on that question, and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the hospital was reversed. For the purposes of certiorari, we therefore find no conflict between this case and Hodges v. Doctors Hospital, supra. Accordingly, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan andBowles, JJ., who concur in the judgment only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 S.E.2d 433, 242 Ga. 522, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-osteopathic-hospital-inc-v-hollingsworth-ga-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack