Georgia Miles v. Bob Burns, et al.

E.D. California

Georgia Miles v. Bob Burns, et al.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 1, 2026·No. 2:25-cv-03757·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GEORGIA MILES, No. 2:25-cv-3757 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 BOB BURNS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding 18 was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, it has already been 20 determined that plaintiff has “struck out” under title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Miles v. Susanville 21 Police Dept., 2:25-cv-2655 DJC AC P, and can only proceed in forma pauperis if she alleges in 22 her complaint that she “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Plaintiff makes no 23 such allegation in her pleadings. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 25 court judge to this case. 26 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 27 (ECF No. 5, 9 & 11) be denied and plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee within 14 days 28 of adoption of these findings and recommendations. ] These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 3 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 | appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 | Dated: April 30, 2026 □□ I / dip Ze

11 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14] 4 15 mile3757.3ks

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GEORGIA MILES, No. 2:25-cv-3757 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 BOB BURNS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding 18 was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, it has already been 20 determined that plaintiff has “struck out” under title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Miles v. Susanville 21 Police Dept., 2:25-cv-2655 DJC AC P, and can only proceed in forma pauperis if she alleges in 22 her complaint that she “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Plaintiff makes no 23 such allegation in her pleadings. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 25 court judge to this case. 26 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 27 (ECF No. 5, 9 & 11) be denied and plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee within 14 days 28 of adoption of these findings and recommendations. ] These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 3 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 | appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 | Dated: April 30, 2026 □□ I / dip Ze

11 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14] 4 15 mile3757.3ks

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Georgia Miles v. Bob Burns, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2026).

Pincite

Georgia Miles v. Bob Burns, et al. (Georgia Miles v. Bob Burns, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related