Georgia Marble Co. v. Strickland
Opinion
The Georgia Marble Company brought this action seeking refund of Georgia and MARTA sales and use taxes paid by the plaintiff in purchasing certain rock crushing equipment it contends is exempt from sales and use tax under the manufacturing machinery exemption provided in Ga. L. 1963, p. 13; Ga. L. 1966, p. 537 (Code Ann. § 92-3403A C (2) (n) (2)). Both parties moved for summary judgment. The Revenue Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment denying refund was granted and the taxpayer appeals. We reverse. Chilivis v. Marble Products Co., 135 Ga. App. 187 (217 SE2d 441) (1975).
In addition to taking the position that none of the equipment was exempt, the Revenue Commissioner argued that certain of the claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We, however, agree with appellant Georgia Marble that the statute of limitations on the claim for refund commenced, as does the period during [207]*207which interest is payable upon refunds, with the payment of the taxes by the vendor to the State Revenue Commissioner and not by the payment by the purchaser to the vendor. Ga. L. 1975, pp. 156, 159-61; Code Ann. § 92-8436 (a), (b).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
253 S.E.2d 155 (Georgia Marble Co. v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.