Georgia M. Spruill v. Mary O'TOOle and Edgar C. Snyder.

294 U.S. 707
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 14, 1935
Docket637
StatusPublished

This text of 294 U.S. 707 (Georgia M. Spruill v. Mary O'TOOle and Edgar C. Snyder.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia M. Spruill v. Mary O'TOOle and Edgar C. Snyder., 294 U.S. 707 (1935).

Opinion

294 U.S. 707

55 S.Ct. 406

79 L.Ed. 1242

Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Mary O'TOOLE and Edgar C. Snyder.*

No. 637.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 21, 1935

Miss Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.

For opinion below, see 74 F.(2d) 559.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

*

Rehearing denied 294 U. S. 732, 55 S. Ct. 510, 79 L. Ed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spruill v. O'Toole
74 F.2d 559 (D.C. Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 U.S. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-m-spruill-v-mary-otoole-and-edgar-c-snyder-scotus-1935.