Georgia M. Spruill v. Harryman Dorsey.
This text of 304 U.S. 565 (Georgia M. Spruill v. Harryman Dorsey.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
304 U.S. 565
58 S.Ct. 951
82 L.Ed. 1531
Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Harryman DORSEY.*
No. 985.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 2, 1938
Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.
Rehearing denied 304 U.S. 590, 58 S.Ct. 1055, 82 L.Ed. ——.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 U.S. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-m-spruill-v-harryman-dorsey-scotus-1938.