Georgia Land & Cotton Co. v. Flint

35 Ga. 226
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, C. J.

Without deciding whether the condition of the agreement was, in fact, stipulated damages or a penalty, there is one view of this case decisive upon the question. Mr. Flint was sworn on the arbitration, and testified that his damages were more than $4,000, for want of punctuality on the part of Oliver to settle; and there was no contradictory evidence to rebut this proof. So, whether we consider this as strictly a case of stipulated damages, or only a forfeiture, the result is the same, as the actual damage is proven to have exceeded this sum.

The judgment, must therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Land & Cotton Co. v. Flint, 35 Ga. 226 (Ga. 1866).

35 Ga. 226 (Georgia Land & Cotton Co. v. Flint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strode v. Smith
131 P. 1032 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)
Jackson Estate v. Suydam
130 P. 360 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)