Georgia Hotel Co. v. Corrugated Bar Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgia Hotel Co. v. Corrugated Bar Co.

89 S.E. 608, 18 Ga. App. 433, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 396

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 19, 1916

Docket6749

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 608 (Georgia Hotel Co. v. Corrugated Bar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia Hotel Co. v. Corrugated Bar Co., 89 S.E. 608, 18 Ga. App. 433, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

Considering the charge of the court as á whole, in the light of the evidence, there is no substantial merit in either of the two special grounds of the motion for a new trial; and since there was testimony to sustain the-verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages; from city court of Savannah — Judge Davis Freeman. June 12, 1915.

Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff in error. Fred T. Saussy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

Considering the charge of the court as á whole, in the light of the evidence, there is no substantial merit in either of the two special grounds of the motion for a new trial; and since there was testimony to sustain the-verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages; from city court of Savannah — Judge Davis Freeman. June 12, 1915.

Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff in error. Fred T. Saussy, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 608, 18 Ga. App. 433, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-hotel-co-v-corrugated-bar-co-gactapp-1916.