Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. Tanner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. Tanner

131 S.E. 191, 34 Ga. App. 809, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 52

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1926

Docket16424

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 S.E. 191 (Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. Tanner, 131 S.E. 191, 34 Ga. App. 809, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 52 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Assuming that the petition in a suit by the insured to recover under a fire-insurance policy fails to allege facts sufficient to show a cause of action, in that it fails to contain any allegation showing that the insured had any insurable interest in the property, such omission may be supplied by amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5682; German-American Ins. Co. v. Davidson, 67 Ga. 11; Ellison v. Georgia R. Co., 87 Ga. 691 (13 S. E. 809); City of Columbus v. Anglin, 120 Ga. 785 (48 S. E. 318) ; Dunn v. Freeman, 24 Ga. App. 504 (101 S. E. 393) ; Davis v. Carroll, 30 Ga. App. 719 (119 S. E. 422). This ruling is not in conflict with Northwestern National Ins. Co. v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co., 20 Ga. App. 506 (93 S. E. 157).

2. Where a fire-insurance policy covers particularly described property which is referred to as “Bellview Sehoolhouse,” and names as the insured “M. T. Tanner, Trustee Bellview School,” it follows that in a suit by “M. T. Tanner, trustee,” to recover for loss under the policy, where the petition, as amended, alleges that at the time of the issuance of the policy and at the time of the fire title to the property insured “was in petitioner and others as trustees for said Bellview School,” all of which was known to the insurer at the time, the petition alleges an insurable interest in the plaintiff. Fenn v. New Orleans Mut. Ins. Co., 53 Ga. 578.

3. A suit brought by a person in his individual capacity, or as trustee, where it does not appear in whom the beneficial interest rests, is subject to an amendment supplying the names of the beneficiaries and alleging that the plaintiff brings the suit for their benefit. Ray v. Ray, [810]*810142 Ga. 290 (82 S. E. 892) ; Richmond & Danville R. Co. v. Bedell, 88 Ga. 591 (15 S. E. 676).

Decided January 15, 1926. Johnson & Adderholt, for plaintiff in error. Charters & Wheeler, contra.

4. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any of the demurrers.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcms, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. Assuming that the petition in a suit by the insured to recover under a fire-insurance policy fails to allege facts sufficient to show a cause of action, in that it fails to contain any allegation showing that the insured had any insurable interest in the property, such omission may be supplied by amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5682; German-American Ins. Co. v. Davidson, 67 Ga. 11; Ellison v. Georgia R. Co., 87 Ga. 691 (13 S. E. 809); City of Columbus v. Anglin, 120 Ga. 785 (48 S. E. 318) ; Dunn v. Freeman, 24 Ga. App. 504 (101 S. E. 393) ; Davis v. Carroll, 30 Ga. App. 719 (119 S. E. 422). This ruling is not in conflict with Northwestern National Ins. Co. v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co., 20 Ga. App. 506 (93 S. E. 157).

2. Where a fire-insurance policy covers particularly described property which is referred to as “Bellview Sehoolhouse,” and names as the insured “M. T. Tanner, Trustee Bellview School,” it follows that in a suit by “M. T. Tanner, trustee,” to recover for loss under the policy, where the petition, as amended, alleges that at the time of the issuance of the policy and at the time of the fire title to the property insured “was in petitioner and others as trustees for said Bellview School,” all of which was known to the insurer at the time, the petition alleges an insurable interest in the plaintiff. Fenn v. New Orleans Mut. Ins. Co., 53 Ga. 578.

3. A suit brought by a person in his individual capacity, or as trustee, where it does not appear in whom the beneficial interest rests, is subject to an amendment supplying the names of the beneficiaries and alleging that the plaintiff brings the suit for their benefit. Ray v. Ray, [810]*810142 Ga. 290 (82 S. E. 892) ; Richmond & Danville R. Co. v. Bedell, 88 Ga. 591 (15 S. E. 676).

Decided January 15, 1926. Johnson & Adderholt, for plaintiff in error. Charters & Wheeler, contra.

4. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any of the demurrers.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcms, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.E. 191, 34 Ga. App. 809, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-farmers-fire-insurance-v-tanner-gactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack