Georgia Department of Corrections v. Couch
This text of 768 S.E.2d 275 (Georgia Department of Corrections v. Couch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Ga. Dept. of Corrections v. Couch, 295 Ga. 469 (759 SE2d 804) (2014) (Couch II), the Supreme Court affirmed our ruling as to Division 1 “albeit under a different rationale,” and reversed our ruling in Division 2 of Ga. Dept. of Corrections v. Couch, 322 Ga. App. 234 (744 SE2d 432) (2013). Accordingly, we vacate Divisions 1 and 2 of our earlier opinion, and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court with respect to those divisions. Division 3 was not addressed by the Supreme Court and in that circumstance we are required to
(1) read [the Supreme] Court’s opinion within the context of the opinion being reversed; (2) to determine whether any portions of the opinion being reversed were neither addressed nor considered by the Supreme Court; and (3) enter an [524]*524appropriate disposition with regard to those portions that is consistent with the issues addressed and considered by [the Supreme] Court.
Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563-564 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001). In so doing, we find that to the extent that Division 3 can be interpreted to sustain any award of attorney fees not consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Couch II, it too is vacated.1
This case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
768 S.E.2d 275, 330 Ga. App. 523, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-department-of-corrections-v-couch-gactapp-2015.